|
COURT
DECISION.......................
(truncated
& modified)
At an
open court session, March 16, 1994 a case was heard about the division of
the apartment of ....................
upon demand of .......,
the plaintiff.
Having
carried out judicial scrutiny and on the bases of the
sufficient facts, the Peoples Court affirmed that she
got married to ........ in 1985. They have two
children as the result of their marriage.
In the
course of their marriage they have been living in the apartment of
his mother on lease rights, located in the
following address: Davitashen district, ..... .
The flat consists of three rooms with total area of 21,6 square metre,
14,6 square metre and 10,8 square metre. There are five people-plaintiffs
registered in it.
By
bringing an actoin to the Court she requests
that her apartment be divided into 2/3 relatively and provide her with a
separate apartment area for her and her children to live in.
The
Peoples Court, having listened to both parties and having studied all the
available facts with regard to the case, has arrived at the conclusion
that it is possible to divide the apartment area belonging to
her, the plaintiff, and her children into a form
of an isolated room and provide her with an apartment order of RA with 81
land order on lease bases. The Peoples Court considers that it is
possible to provide the plaintiff with a room of 21,6 square metre
apartment area.
On the
assumption of the aforesaid and being guided by the Municipal Court Law of
RA, Articles 190.196, the Peoples Court concluded:
To
provide her with a 21,6 square metre room on
lease rights for her and her children to live in. The location of the
apartment is as follows: Davitashen 1 district,
........
To
provide him with 14,6 square metre and 10,8
square metre rooms on lease rights for ............
and him to live in. It is possible to jointly use the communal
conveniences.
The decision is subject to appellate in not more
than 10 days time.
Judge in
Peoples Court - /signature/
Juries in
Peoples Court - /signature/ |
